|
STANDARD 1: CANDIDATE KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS,
AND DISPOSITIONS
|
Candidates preparing to work in
schools as teachers or other
professional school personnel
know and demonstrate the
content, pedagogical, and
professional knowledge, skills,
and dispositions necessary to
help all candidates learn.
Assessments indicate that
candidates meet professional,
state, and institutional
standards. |
Follow-up
studies of teacher education graduates
indicate a high degree of success. For
example, on the
2005 New Teacher
Survey
(Document
1.0.A),
the results of Section B (Preparation)
suggest that new teachers believe that they
have acquired knowledge and skills that
enable them to understand students’ social,
emotional, physical, and cognitive
development, as well as how their family and
cultural background may influence learning.
Graduates of the program also believe they
are equipped to use knowledge and skills in
ways that enable students to achieve high
levels of learning and that they are able to
use multiple assessment methods.
Table 1.0.1
includes program transition points for the
initial licensure program and
Table 1.0.2
includes program transition points for the
advanced licensure program. For an in-depth
look of the unit’s assessment system, refer
to Standard 2 of this document.
Transition Points for Initial Licensure
|
Transition Point One |
Entry (Admission to Teacher
Education) |
|
Transition Point Two |
Mid-Point ( Retention in Teacher
Education and Admission to Student
Teaching) |
|
Transition Point Three |
Exit of Clinical (Student
Teaching) |
|
Transition Point Four |
Completion of Graduation
Requirements |
|
Transition Point Five |
Induction (& Follow-up Studies)
|
Table 1.0.2
Transition Points for Advanced Licensure
(Master’s in Elementary Education)
|
Transition Point One |
Entry (Admission to Graduate
Studies) |
|
Transition Point Two |
Mid-Point ( Retention in the M.Ed.
Program & Completion of Action
Research) |
|
Transition Point Three |
Completion (of Digital Teaching
Portfolio, and Graduation
Requirements) |
|
Transition Point Four |
Application of M. Ed. Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions &
Follow-up
Studies |
Element
1.1: Content Knowledge for Teacher
Candidates
Teacher
education candidates, at the initial
licensure level, attain content knowledge
through two distinct course sequences. The
first sequence addresses knowledge in the
academic content area, which is achieved
through the completion of a specific set of
courses within the major. This is
especially true of initial licensure
candidates in secondary areas (9-12) and
P-12 candidates who actually complete an
academic major in their chosen field. The
second sequence of courses addresses the
completion of core courses specific to the
teaching field, such as foundations of
education and teaching methodology.
Advanced licensure candidates complete a
number of courses that increase their
knowledge through a core set courses and a
second set of courses in teaching skills
appropriate to elementary school students.
The Exit
Evaluation Criteria of Student Teaching
(Items 8.1 through 8.6) that cooperating
teachers and university supervisors complete
demonstrates that candidates possess the
ability to identify major concepts within
their subject area (Table
1.1.1).
Table 1.1.1
Exit
Evaluation Criteria of Student Teaching*
|
Exit
Criteria Standard Measured |
2002-2003 |
2003-2004 |
2004-2005 |
|
8.1 Identifying major concepts of
the subject area |
4.0 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
|
8.2 Selecting content appropriate
for level of class |
4.1 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
|
8.3 Identifying skills basic to
areas |
4.1 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
|
8.4 Integrating knowledge from
various fields |
4.1 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
|
8.5 Using questioning techniques
while
incorporating various levels
of questioning |
4.0 |
4.2 |
4.1 |
|
8.6 Helping students recognize
the purpose and
importance of topics
or activities |
4.0 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
|
Total Average for Exit Criteria
Standard 8.0 |
4.1 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
Scale: 1-5
with 5 being the highest. *Used until spring
semester, 2005
Praxis II
scores pass rates also demonstrate that
candidates have the command of their subject
matter (Table
1.1.2).
Table 1.1.2
Praxis
II Data as Reported in IHE Report
|
Praxis II Scores+ |
2002-2003
|
2003-2004
|
2004-2005*
|
|
Program |
Candidates Taking Exam |
Percent Passing |
Candidates Taking Exam |
Percent Passing |
Candidates Taking Exam |
Percent Passing |
|
Art |
0 |
|
1 |
|
n/a |
|
|
Birth-Kindergarten |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|
Elementary Education |
12 |
83% |
14 |
93% |
12 |
83% |
|
English |
0 |
|
1 |
|
n/a |
|
|
Middle Grades |
3 |
100% |
5 |
100% |
n/a |
|
|
Mathematics |
1 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
Music |
0 |
|
0 |
|
n/a |
|
|
Physical Education |
0 |
|
0 |
|
n/a |
|
|
Social Studies |
2 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
Spanish |
|
|
1 |
|
n/a |
|
|
Special Education |
1 |
|
3 |
100% |
3 |
100% |
|
Unit
Summary |
19 |
79 |
24 |
96 |
15 |
87 |
*Estimated
from data submitted for Title II Report.
+Percentages not reported if number of test
takers less than 3
Completion of
key course assignments and examinations,
culminating performance products, such as
the professional portfolio presented in
Responsive Pedagogy (EDU 4333) and products
of learning in other courses, demonstrate
that candidates possess the appropriate
content knowledge. Although follow-up
studies from employers (Table
1.1.3) indicate a slight
decline during 2005-06, the overall rating
remained above average regarding content
knowledge in program graduates’ teaching
area.
In the
advanced licensure M.Ed. (Master of
Education) program, as it is described on
page 8 of this document, candidates show
command of their content knowledge through
the completion of course assignments,
presentation of their digital teaching
portfolio, and presentation of their action
research product.
Content
Knowledge for Initial Teacher Candidates
Initial
licensure candidates actually begin their
program when they matriculate at
Winston-Salem State University. Most
candidates know by the end of their freshman
year if teacher education will be their
chosen field. General education represents,
for all initial-licensure candidates, the
foundation of their content knowledge. In
some instances, such as in the case of
elementary education candidates, some
general education courses may also provide
content knowledge for their teaching area.
Entry
Point (Admission to Teacher Education)
All
teacher education candidates who wish to
receive initial licensure are required to
fulfill admission requirements. Content
knowledge is measured through the following
requirements:
1. After completing general education,
candidates must take and successfully pass
Praxis I. Required scores include the
following: Reading 176, Mathematics 173,
and Writing 173; CBT (Computer-Based Test):
Reading 323, Mathematics 318, and Writing
319. Certification-only candidates who have
a minimum overall GPA of 2.50 and at least a
grade of “C” in basic academic courses
(English and mathematics) are exempt from
taking Praxis I. For further information,
refer to
Table 1.1.4.
2. Candidates
must have a minimum cumulative academic
average of 2.50. Candidates to teacher
education programs routinely have higher
GPAs than 2.50. This GPA is higher than the
minimum of 2.0 required by most programs at
the University. For further information,
refer to
Table 1.1.5.
3. Candidates
must have earned a grade of "C" or better in
SPH 2341 (Fundamentals of Speech), Second
Academic Concentration (SAC) courses for
elementary and middle grades education
candidates, and in all English courses.
Admission to teacher
education is a prerequisite for most
4000-level courses, methods courses, and
student teaching. Professional education
courses, listed below, gather data through
the use of Tk20 (assessment management
system), which allows faculty to align
standards to course artifacts, products,
rubrics, and learning outcomes. Data
gathered through Tk20 indicate that the
unit’s conceptual framework and program
standards are being addressed. In addition,
data are reviewed to make modifications to
course assignments and ensure that the
unit’s conceptual framework and programs
standards are appropriately addressed. For
further information about Tk20 visit the
following site
(https://wssu.tk20.com)
and Exhibit Room for work samples of
professional education core course.
Professional
Education Core Courses
SPE
3200 Exceptional Children in the
Regular Classroom or
EDU
2304 Sociological, Historical, and
Philosophical Foundations of Education
EDU
3336 Educational Media/Computers in
Education
EDU
4338 Psychological Foundations of
Education
PED
4320 Adaptive Physical Education for
Exceptional Children (for PED candidates)
EDU
4333 Responsive Pedagogy (Capstone
course for ELE, BKE, SPE, PED, MUS, and ART)
……
.….. Methods Course (All programs
have a minimum of one and in some two or
more)
……
…... Reading Course
EDU
4981 Observation, Student Teaching and
Practicum
Mid-Point (Retention in Teacher Education
and Admission to Student Teaching)
After
candidates have been admitted to the teacher
education program, they must maintain good
academic standing. The record of each
candidate admitted is reviewed at least once
each semester by the candidate's academic
advisor. A candidate must maintain a
minimum of a 2.50 GPA and make a grade of
“C” or better in all second courses of study
(Elementary and Middle Grades Education
programs), English courses, professional
education, and specialty area courses.
Cases in which the candidate’s GPA goes
below 2.50 have been few. In very rare
cases candidates have been directed to
repeat courses where they earned grades of
“D” or “C” to bring their GPAs to the
required 2.50 minimum.
During
this transition point and in preparation for
student teaching, candidates’ evaluation
begins with the application to student
teaching. The director of Student Teaching,
academic advisors, and designated members of
the Teacher Education Council (TEC) review
academic preparation, completion of
specialty area, professional courses, and
personal dispositions. The director of
student teaching also works with the various
departments to ensure that candidates have
satisfied all departmental requirements.
Any special concerns are brought to the
attention of the program coordinator in the
respective department. Such concerns may
indicate a need for review and action by the
departmental chairperson, the dean of the
School of Education and Human Performance,
or the Teacher Education Council. Table
1.1.6 demonstrates that the
retention rate for the last three academic
years has been high.
Table
1.1.6
Candidate
Retention Rate 2002-2006
|
|
Admission Year |
|
|
2002-2003 |
2003-2004 |
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
|
Retention Rate |
96% |
96% |
89% |
93% |
Exit of
Clinical (Completion of Student Teaching)
and Completion of Graduation Requirements
Although there
have been changes to the multiple
evaluations points for student teaching
within the last (2005-06) academic year,
such as the mid-term and final Student
Teaching Evaluation, Student Teaching
Portfolio, Student Teaching Exit Conference,
Formative Observation Data Instrument, and
SEHP Questionnaire Student Evaluation, the
unit’s student teaching completion success
rate has remained high. Table
1.1.7 represents an overall 97.1%
completion rate. Additionally, GPAs and
other measures of content knowledge indicate
a high rate of success of all teacher
education candidates.
Table
1.1.7
Candidate
Retention & Student Teaching Completion Rate
|
|
Academic Year |
|
|
2003-2004 |
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
Overall |
|
Total
Enrollment |
35 |
36 |
34 |
105 |
|
Total
Completion |
33 |
36 |
33 |
102 |
|
Total Percentage |
94.3% |
100.0% |
97.1% |
97.1% |
Content
knowledge is assessed throughout the student
teaching experience by cooperating teachers
and university supervisors. Formative and
summative evaluations of student teaching
evaluations show that candidates demonstrate
content knowledge in their respective
teaching area at a satisfactory level.
Induction (and Follow-Up Studies)
Although
Praxis II has been discontinued as a state
licensure requirement for the initial
certification level, except for elementary
and special education, the unit still
requires this examination for program
assessment purposes. Since few candidates
have actually taken the Praxis II within the
last three academic years, fluctuations in
the performance of the unit as a whole have
been easily affected. However,
Table 1.1.2
clearly indicates an increment in
Praxis II performance of teacher education
candidates. This, along with other
measures, such as follow-up studies
described on
Table 1.1.3, validates
the mastery of content knowledge at the
beginning of the candidate’s teaching
career.
Follow-up
studies, such as the
2005 New Teacher
Survey
(Document
1.0.A),
of program graduates indicate proficiency in
their academic content area. More
specifically, when asked about the program
preparation (Part B-Preparation), candidates
acknowledged being well prepared to address
classroom expectations effectively. For
example, when questioned about the knowledge
and skills and the ability to relate
knowledge to real-world experiences,
candidates responded positively (83.3% and
93.4%, respectively).
Within the
last three academic years, the employment
rate of program graduates indicates an above
average rate. However, these figures only
account for program completers who remain in
North Carolina. Table
1.1.8 provides specific
percentages of program completers’
employment rate.
Table
1.1.8
Candidate
Employment Rate
|
Year |
Student Teachers |
Percent Licensed |
Percent Employed |
|
2004-2005 |
27 |
81 |
67 |
|
2003-2004 |
36 |
72 |
67 |
|
2002-2003 |
26 |
85 |
65 |
Institutions
of Higher Education (IHE) reports also
indicate employers’ and mentors’ high degree
of satisfaction with program graduates. Tables
1.1.3
and
1.1.9 clearly indicate
that employers and mentors, as individuals
who work closely with program completers,
rated program graduates’ performance very
favorably. In some instances program
graduates have even been nominated as
“Teacher of the Year” within their own
school or school district.
Content
Knowledge of Advanced Teacher Candidates
There is only
one advanced licensure program at WSSU, the
Master’s Degree in Elementary Education
(M.Ed.). Candidates in this program
complete a Comprehensive Teaching and
Technology Portfolio as the culminating
project. The North Carolina Department of
Public Instruction provides a set of
guidelines and program standards for the
advanced M (master) license. Candidates in
this program are practicing elementary
school teachers who hold an A (initial)
license in elementary education and who are
expected to advance their knowledge and
teaching skills in this area.
Advanced
licensure candidates in the Elementary
Education Program demonstrate content
knowledge at various transition points and
during their program. One set of courses,
such as research and advanced foundations
courses, addresses core knowledge expected
of most graduate candidates. A second set
of courses addresses curriculum content and
instructional strategies specific to the
elementary school curriculum. Performance
after program completion also confirms
graduates’ strengths in content knowledge,
such as the completion of National Board
Certification by six program completers in
2004 and 2005 (Velvet McGregor, Jennifer
Fuller, Cassandra Dobson, Kristal Oglesby,
and Tabitha Saunders). Evidence by the
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools’
recognition of Board certified candidates
may be found at the following web link: http://wsfcs.k12.nc.us/admin/Minutes/05-06/bm05-0110.htm—WS/FCS
Board of Education Minutes.
A specific program assessment for this
advanced licensure program is found in
Standard 2 of this document.
Entry
Point (Admission to Graduate Studies)
Advanced
licensure candidates bring significant
content knowledge to the graduate program in
elementary education. At the admission
point, program candidates must meet
requirements which provide evidence of their
content knowledge. Admission requirements
follow:
-
Baccalaureate
degree from an accredited institution
-
A North Carolina
initial license in elementary education
or an equivalent from another state
-
Documentation of
teaching experience in an elementary
school
-
A minimum GPA of
2.5
-
An acceptable
recent (within the last 5 years) GRE
(Graduate Record Examination) or MAT
(Miller Analogies Test) score.
Tables 1.1.10
and 1.1.11,
respectively, show program candidates’
GRE/MAT scores and GPAs for the last three
academic years.
Table 1.
1.10
M.Ed.
Candidates’ MAT and GRE Scores at
Entry Point
|
Program Area |
Data |
Admission Academic Year |
Summary Averages |
|
|
|
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|
|
Elementary Education |
Average of MAT |
21 |
29 |
22 |
21 |
29 |
393 |
65 |
|
Average of MAT New |
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
Average of GRE |
|
1070 |
1196 |
860 |
|
580 |
1000 |
Table 1.
1.11
GPA Mean
for M. Ed Candidates at Entry Point
|
Year |
Number Admitted |
Mean of Overall GPAs |
|
2003 |
41 |
3.35 |
|
2004 |
38 |
3.09 |
|
2005 |
3 |
3.31 |
Mid-Point (Retention in the M.Ed. Program)
In order to
remain in good standing in the advanced
licensure program, candidates must maintain
a GPA of 3.0. Additionally, graduate
faculty members evaluate candidates’ work
through a variety of course assignments and
comprehensive learning products, such as the
Action Research Project.
Table 1.1.12 shows the
percentage of grades of candidates upon
completion of core courses, with a high
percentage (91.7 percent) clustered around
grades of “A” and “B”. Candidates in the
advanced licensure program further develop
content knowledge by completing their field
experience products and unit lesson plans,
all core courses (listed below), EDU 6315
(Curriculum Integration), and methods
courses. In addition to having to maintain
the appropriate GPA of 3.0, M.Ed. candidates
are not allowed to remain in the program
when they earn more than two grades of “C.”
It is also at the mid-point that candidates
complete the M.Ed. survey on dispositions.
EDU
6301 Curriculum Development and
Cultural Diversity (3)
EDU
6302 Media, Technology, and Diversity
(3)
EDU
6303 Psychology of Teaching and
Learning (3)
EDU
6304 Research Methodology (3)
EDU
6305 Statistics: Introduction to
Quantitative Methods (3)
Completion of Action Research Project
Candidates
conduct an action research project related
to an issue or concern in their elementary
school classroom. The research focuses on
one of the content areas and must
incorporate diversity. The topic is chosen
and the proposal is written and presented by
the end of the second semester. The study
is conducted during the second year and the
research defended during the first summer
session of the second year. This is a
significant benchmark in the completion of
the advanced licensure program because it
includes the knowledge, skills, and
dispositions supported by the program
standards. Aggregate data of scores on this
project are included on
Table 1.1.13.
All the products have been at the acceptable
or target level for the past three years.
The program has strengthened the
instructional sequence to bring all products
to the target level. Samples of this
project are found in the Exhibit Room.
Table 1.1.13
Action Research Assessment
|
Year |
Target |
Acceptable |
Unacceptable |
|
2006 |
7 |
2 |
0 |
|
2005 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
|
2004 |
3 |
6 |
0 |
Completion of Graduation Requirements
M.Ed. program
candidates develop content knowledge through
two sequences of courses. The first
sequence includes a core of courses intended
to provide an advanced knowledge base in
curriculum, technology, learning, research,
and diversity.
EDU
6301 Curriculum Development and
Cultural Diversity (3)
EDU
6302 Media, Technology, and Diversity
(3)
EDU
6303 Psychology of Teaching and
Learning (3)
EDU
6304 Research Methodology (3)
EDU
6305 Statistics: Introduction to
Quantitative Methods (3)
The second
sequence of courses addresses the teaching
field in elementary education, instructional
methodology, application of teaching
principles, and integration of technology.
EDU
6315 Integrating the Elementary
Program and Curriculum (3)
EDU
6316 Fundamentals of Mathematics:
Exploring Theories and Practices (3)
EDU
6317 Teaching and Learning Sciences
(3)
EDU
6318 Teaching Social Studies for
Elementary Education (3)
EDU
6319 Masters of Education Internship,
Phase I (3)
EDU
6320 Masters of Education Internship,
Phase II (3)
RED
6310 Teaching Reading as Thinking (3)
Products of
learning for the M.Ed. Program advance the
level of knowledge and instructional skills
appropriate for elementary school students.
Completion of Digital Teaching Portfolio
Candidates
complete a Comprehensive Teaching and
Technology Portfolio that integrates the
State’s Advanced Technology Competencies
with a demonstration of mastery of the
Advanced Master’s Competencies. This
portfolio reflects the results of the
development plan that emerged from the
student’s initial assessment. Students
produce the project during their
two-semester internship. Aggregate scores
of the evaluation of this portfolio
(Table 1.1.14)
indicate a high rate of success. Portfolio
samples can be found in
Exhibit 1.1.1.
Table 1.1.14
Digital Teaching Portfolio Assessment
|
Year |
Target |
Acceptable |
Unacceptable |
|
2006 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
|
2005 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
|
2004 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
Course
assignments and comprehensive products of
learning demonstrate that content knowledge
for the advanced master licensure in the
Elementary Education program is being
achieved. In addition, GPAs in these
courses indicate a high degree of mastery in
content knowledge. Table
1.1.15 summarizes M.Ed.
course alignment with North Carolina
Department of Public Instruction’s Standards
for the New Master’s Degree/Advanced
Competencies (Document
1.1.A), Sample Class
Assignments, and Assessment.
In addition to
these measures of content knowledge,
candidates complete an Exit Survey and
Assessment of Dispositions questionnaire. Table
1.1.16
includes a summary
of the results of a survey conducted in
2003.
Application of M.
Ed. Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions &
Follow-up Studies
Results from
interviews with principals (Table
1.1.17) indicate high proficiency
by candidates in academic content, skills,
and dispositions. The overall professional
growth was rated as positive.
Table 1.1.17
Summary of School Principals Interviews for
2004 Class
|
Area |
Growth |
No Discernible Growth |
Decline |
|
Knowledge, Skills & Dispositions |
6 |
2 |
0 |
|
Leadership |
6 |
2 |
0 |
|
Collaboration |
5 |
3 |
0 |
|
Professional Growth |
7 |
1 |
0 |
N
= 8
The IHE
reports, which gather candidates’ and
employers’ feedback regarding program
quality, the ability to connect subject
matter to student needs, leadership
abilities, and the ability to promote
learning for all students, indicate a high
level of program approval. For specific
information about these data, see
Table 1.1.18.
Impact on PK-5
educational settings has also been highly
positive as demonstrated by candidates’
selection for exemplary teaching.
Specifically,
Jennifer Fuller was selected Winston-Salem
Forsyth County Schools’ 2006 Teacher of the
Year and Patsy Murrill was one of the ten
finalists for the 2005 Teacher of Year in
the same school district. For specific
information about these two candidates’
nomination, see
Document 1.1.B.
Table 1.1.18
IHE Follow-up
Survey Data of Master’s Program 2004-2005
|
Satisfaction with... |
Program Completers |
Employer |
|
Quality of teacher education
program. |
3.45 |
3.54 |
|
Connect subject matter and
learner's needs. |
3.64 |
3.67 |
|
Implement research-based
approaches. |
3.64 |
3.58 |
|
Assume leadership roles. |
3.55 |
3.58 |
|
Facilitate learning for diverse
students. |
3.55 |
3.67 |
|
Engage in continuous
professional development. |
3.55 |
3.58 |
|
Number of Surveys Received |
11.00 |
13.00 |
|
Number of Surveys Mailed |
18.00 |
18.00 |
Scale: 1-4, with 4 being highest
Element
1.2: Content Knowledge for Other School
Personnel
WSSU does not
have programs for other school personnel at
this time.
Element
1.3: Pedagogical Content Knowledge for
Teacher Candidates
All
teacher education candidates must complete
an average of 30 semester hours of
pedagogical and professional studies.
Courses include foundations of education,
methods, educational psychology, reading,
technology applications, special education,
and a capstone course. The last semester is
entirely dedicated to the student teaching
practicum. “Every Child’s Teacher,” a motto
that identifies the Core Standards for
Teachers in North Carolina
(http://www.ncptsc.org/EveryTeacher.htm),
provides the framework for pedagogical
studies. These standards address the
following pedagogical areas: (I) Teachers
know the content they teach; (II) teachers
know how to teach students; (III) teachers
are successful in teaching a diverse
population of students; (IV) teachers are
leaders; (V) teachers are reflective about
their practice; and (VI) teachers respect
and care about their students. Central to
pedagogical studies is the conceptual
framework
Document 1.3.A–Conceptual Framework
(http://sehp.wssu.edu/visit/ncate/cf/cf.htm),
which provides the foundations of knowledge
content for all teacher education programs.
Data indicate
that upon program completion candidates
demonstrate the appropriate pedagogical
content knowledge within their teaching
field. Course work and field experiences
enable candidates to develop the
understanding and application of pedagogical
principles. Methods courses, in particular,
provide the opportunity for candidates to
develop competencies in planning
instruction, integration of knowledge and
technology, and assessment of learning.
Each individual course and field experience
includes an assessment component of
assignments, course projects, products of
learning, and field work where candidates
demonstrate their pedagogical knowledge.
Reviews of student teaching evaluations for
the initial licensure program and the
Electronic Teaching Portfolio for the
advanced licensure program indicate
candidates’ pedagogical proficiency.
Follow-up studies for both initial and
advanced levels also support the command of
pedagogical content knowledge of program
candidates.
Pedagogical
Content Knowledge for Initial Teacher
Candidates
Entry
and Mid-Point (Admission to Teacher
Education and Admission to
Student Teaching)
By the time
program candidates are admitted to the
Teacher Education Program they have
completed a number of introductory and
foundations courses that provide the initial
levels of pedagogical knowledge. This
initial pedagogical knowledge level is
addressed through the following courses:
SPE
3200 Exceptional Children in the
Regular Classroom or
EDU
2304 Sociological, Historical, and
Philosophical Foundations of Education
EDU
3336 Educational Media/Computers in
Education
EDU
4338 Psychological Foundations of
Education
PED
4320 Adaptive Physical Education for
Exceptional Children (for PED candidates)
EDU
4333 Responsive Pedagogy (Capstone
course for ELE, BKE, SPE, PED, MUS, and ART)
……
.…… Methods Course
(All programs have a minimum of one and, in
some cases,
two or more)
……
……. Reading Course
EDU
4981 Observation, Student Teaching
and Practicum
Candidates
demonstrate knowledge of the North Carolina
Core, Diversity, and Technology Standards
through the completion of course assignments
and various products of learning. Courses
that include field experiences provide
candidates the opportunity to observe and
initiate interactions with P-12 students.
Analysis of course requirements and
products of learning also indicates the use
of assessment rubrics. Assessment measures
of these courses, such as grades and
candidate sample work, indicate a consistent
performance above the 2.50 required GPA
program requirement. Table
1.3.1 includes mean GPAs
for the last three academic years of teacher
education completers. Total average for the
last three years indicates a significantly
higher GPA for teacher education candidates
than the required 2.0 by most programs
across campus.
When
candidates have fulfilled admission
requirements for student teaching, they
demonstrate an in-depth level of pedagogical
knowledge. This is accomplished through the
completion of the following courses:
RED
4311 Reading Diagnosis and Correction (ELE
majors)
RED
4362 Methods and Materials of Reading
Instruction for Middle Grades (MGE majors)
RED
4364 Reading in the Content Area for Secondary
Education
EDU 4338 Psychological
Foundations of Education (All programs)
EDU 4333 Responsive Pedagogy (ELE,
SPE, MGE, BKE, ART, MUS programs)
EDU ……. One or more Methods
courses for every program
These
4000-level courses, which candidates take
only after they have been formally admitted
to teacher education, advance their
pedagogical knowledge. Most of these
courses also require field experiences that
further enhance candidates’ understanding
and application of pedagogical knowledge.
Course assessment rubrics, products of
learning, and field experience evaluations
provide evidence of development and
application of pedagogical knowledge. More
specifically, candidate work samples and
course grades provide concrete evidence of
pedagogical knowledge. Work
samples
such as lesson plans, field experience
assessment, and other products of learning
may be viewed in
Exhibit 1.3.1. The use
of Tk20 allows course instructors alignment
of course objectives and course assignments
with the unit’s conceptual framework
and
North Carolina Core standards. For further
evidence, please refer to online Tk20 course
assignments at
(https://wssu.tk20.com)
Methods and
capstone courses, such as
Responsive
Pedagogy, (Document
1.3.B—EDU 4333
syllabus) include specific measures of
candidates’ pedagogical knowledge.
Candidate-generated lesson plans,
microteaching examples during campus
instruction, small- and large-group teaching
demonstrations in the field, and
instructional technology applications
indicate a broad knowledge of instructional
strategies. Candidates’ e-portfolios
highlight expertise that meets the needs of
P-12 students and their communities.
Specifically, candidates who enroll in EDU
4333 (Responsive Pedagogy) are required to
complete a Family Partnership Plan. For
more specific information about this plan,
consult
Document 1.3.C. A team
of faculty follows a specific rubric to
ensure fairness and accuracy in judging this
and other products included in the
e-portfolios that candidates present during
the capstone course. For example, aggregate
data for the spring and fall of 2005
indicate that eleven (11) participants in
the Family Partnership Plan received rating
at the Target (“A” letter grade) level and
twenty-seven (27) at the Acceptable (“B”
letter grade) level. An analysis of
Responsive Pedagogy course assessment and
evaluation (Table
1.3.2 and
Table 1.3.3) indicate
that for the last three years, candidates
consistently scored above average.
Along this
pedagogical knowledge continuum, candidates’
dispositions (Table
1.6.1) are evaluated at
several transition points. This provides
yet another piece of evidence regarding
attitudinal growth of candidates toward
pedagogical knowledge. Specifically,
on a survey of dispositions, candidates
identified as a strength the
acknowledgement of the value
associated with multiple perspectives of
teaching and learning (Disposition number 6)
and a belief in high achievement and
expectation for all students (Disposition
number 12). Further information about
dispositions will be included in Element
1.6.
Exit of
Clinical (Completion of Student Teaching)
and Completion of Graduation Requirements
Formative and
summative evaluation of student teaching
completed by the cooperating teacher,
university supervisor, and sometimes the
school principal are regular components of
the Student Teaching Practicum. Cooperating
teachers and university supervisors
collaborate in the assessment of student
teachers to ensure the development of
pedagogical knowledge. Data analysis prior
to 2005-2006 of Student Teaching Exit
Evaluation Criteria (Table
1.3.4) and Bi-Weekly
Evaluation results (Table
1.3.5), which address the
ability to prepare for instruction,
instructional delivery, classroom
management, and assessment of learning,
demonstrate a high level of competence and
performance. Multiple approaches to
evaluating the student teaching experience
ensure credibility, fairness, accuracy, and
consistency. During the 2005-2006 AY the
student teaching and field experiences
underwent assessment changes, which are
included on Table 1.3.6
and
Exhibit 1.3.2—Field Experience
and Student Teaching Assessments. For a
more in-depth look at student teaching,
refer to Standard
3 of this Institutional Report. Table
1.3.7 includes a summary
of the new Student Teaching Evaluation for
2005-06 AY. Elementary, middle-grades,
social studies student teachers are included
on this summary. The capstone course,
methods courses, and courses in educational
technology demonstrate that candidates are
able to integrate technology in their
teaching. Specifically, analysis of EDU
3336: Educational Media, Computers in
Education (Document
1.3.D) shows that
candidates are expected to develop lesson
plans through the use of multi-media
presentations, Web Quest, the Internet,
Microsoft Excel, and other software
applications.
As in other
pedagogical courses, candidates are expected
to obtain a minimum grade of “C” or better
on this course.
Table 1.3.8 shows
aggregate data of EDU 3336 for the last five
years. For some of these products, please
see work samples in the
Exhibit 1.3.3. Technology applications are not limited the
above course, but are infused throughout the
entire pedagogical studies continuum.
Review of professional course syllabi
reveals ample use of technology, especially
in methods courses.
Table 1.3.6
2005 -
2006 Office of Student Teaching Assessments
|
Assessment |
When
Completed |
By
Whom |
|
Early
Field Experience Evaluation |
End
of semester |
Cooperating Teacher |
|
Pre-clinical Reflection |
End
of semester |
Candidate |
|
Student Teaching Evaluation |
Midterm & End of semester |
Candidate, Cooperating Teacher,
University Supervisor |
|
Preclinical Checklist |
Prior
to preclinical |
Candidate and Advisor |
|
Student Teaching Checklist |
Prior
to student teaching |
Candidate and Advisor |
|
Student Teaching Portfolio |
During Student Teaching |
Candidate |
|
Student Teaching Exit Conference |
End
of Student Teaching |
Candidate, University Supervisor,
Director of Student Teaching |
|
Preclinical & Student Teaching
Application |
Semester before preclinical |
Candidate |
Additionally, there are several initiatives
in place to promote the use of technology in
pedagogical studies. For example, the PT3 (http://tip.wssu.edu
— Preparing
Tomorrow’s Teachers to Use Technology)
grant enabled pedagogical studies faculty
and faculty from Arts and Sciences to
promote interdisciplinary collaboration.
Candidates and faculty regularly utilize
technology available across campus through
the Center for Innovative Teaching,
Technology, Learning and Evaluation (http://myweb.wssu.edu/mcfeetersf/faqs.htm—CITTLE),
such as the use of Bb (Blackboard) for the
development and delivery of online courses,
faculty development, technology training,
and other technology services. The latest
effort includes the utilization of Tk20 as a
data-gathering and data-analysis tool to
ensure alignment of course assignments with
North Carolina Core Standards, Conceptual
Framework components, and specialty area
standards.
Surveys
intended to measure the level of technology
skills of teacher candidates indicate from
average to above-average levels of
proficiency in the use of technology. This
is the case of IHE Reports, which include a
specific question related to the use of
technology.
Table 1.3.9 summarizes four years
of technology use input from program
completers, mentors, and employers
Induction (and Follow-Up Studies)
The 2005
New Teacher Survey’s Section B (Table
1.3.10) specifically addresses
pedagogical preparation. Program graduates
were asked to address specific pedagogical
knowledge and skills as a result of their
training. The following includes a
representative sample of their answers.
The IHE
Reports also survey program graduates,
mentors, employers about the level of
program preparation. The ratings of these
surveys indicate a high level of
satisfaction with program
quality. For
further evidence, refer to the following
documentation that presents composite
results for the last four academic years (Document
1.3.E).
Table 1.3.9
Follow-Up Survey Technology Use
|
Degree |
Response Category |
Respondent |
2002-2003 |
2003-2004 |
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
|
Undergraduate |
Prepared in use of technology to
enhance learning... |
Program Completers |
3.63 |
3.23 |
3.46 |
3.4 |
|
Undergraduate |
Prepared in use of technology to
enhance learning... |
Employer |
3 |
3.5 |
3.53 |
3.07 |
|
Undergraduate |
Prepared in use of technology to
enhance learning... |
Mentor |
3.5 |
3 |
3.13 |
3.2 |
|
Undergraduate |
Number of Surveys Received. |
Employer |
12 |
10 |
15 |
15 |
|
Undergraduate |
Number of Surveys Received. |
Mentor |
11 |
8 |
15 |
15 |
|
Undergraduate |
Number of Surveys Received. |
Program Completers |
17 |
13 |
13 |
10 |
Scale: 1-4, with 4 being highest
Table 1.3.10
2005
New Teacher Survey (section B)
|
As
result of my teacher preparation
program, I am able to: |
|
Item |
Statement |
Percent |
|
B.1 |
Use my knowledge and skills in ways
that help all students achieve high
academic Standards |
83.3 |
|
B.4 |
Relate classroom experiences to the
real world. |
93.4 |
|
B.5 |
Understand how students' social,
emotional, physical and cognitive
development may influence learning. |
83.3 |
|
B.6 |
Understand how students' family and
cultural background may influence
learning. |
90.0 |
|
B.8. |
Identify and address special
learning needs and/or difficulties.
|
83.3 |
|
B.10 |
Create and maintain a classroom
environment that promotes social
development, collaboration and
social responsibility. |
86.7 |
|
B.11 |
Develop students' questioning and
discussion skills. |
86.6 |
|
B.13 |
Plan
instruction, create curriculum and
solve problems with colleagues.
|
83.3 |
|
B.18 |
Use a
variety of assessments such as
observations, portfolios, tests,
student work, and parental feedback,
knowledge of student interests to
determine student strengths, needs,
and Programs. |
83.4 |
Pedagogical
Content Knowledge for Advanced Teacher
Candidates
In addition to
advancing their content knowledge in the
elementary school curriculum, candidates in
the M.Ed. Program also increase their
pedagogical content knowledge.
Specifically, methods courses in their
teaching area enable candidates the
opportunity to become more effective
teachers. Data indicate that program
candidates demonstrate pedagogical
proficiency. Instructional design,
integration of subject matter and
technology, application of assessment, and
other products of learning in various
courses show candidates’ mastery of
pedagogical knowledge. Program graduate
surveys and school principal interviews
re-affirm the program pedagogical content
knowledge.
Entry
Point (Admission to Graduate Studies)
Advanced
licensure candidates bring significant
pedagogical content knowledge to the
graduate program in elementary education at
the entry point. An admission requirement
includes a North Carolina initial license (A
license) in elementary education. Until
recently, candidates were also required to
have two years of teaching experience in an
elementary school setting. However, the
present set of requirements excludes years
of experience to allow highly motivated
first-year teachers the option of commencing
their graduate students without any time
limitations. This level of pedagogical
content knowledge is further advanced
through a set of core and specialty area
courses (See
Table 1.1.15).
Program syllabi indicate that the M.Ed.
Program provides a strong foundation on
pedagogy. While the North Carolina New
Master's Degree/Advanced Competencies
provide one of the main frameworks for
pedagogical content knowledge, program
faculty align their course objectives to
national standards, such as the National
Board for Professional Teaching Standards,
INTASC (Interstate
New Teacher Assessment and Support
Consortium), ISTE (International
Society for Technology in Education), and
professional organization standards.
Mid-Point (Retention in the M.Ed. Program)
Throughout the
M.Ed. Program, candidates continue
development of pedagogical content
knowledge. Core courses and, more
specifically, specialty area courses (below)
contribute to increase candidates’
pedagogical knowledge. Course assignments
and learning products specifically equip
candidates with pedagogical knowledge for
elementary school settings. Field
experience products, unit and lesson plans,
digital teaching portfolio, and completion
of the action research project contribute to
a higher level of pedagogical knowledge.
EDU
6315 Integrating the Elementary
Program and Curriculum (3)
EDU
6316 Fundamentals of Mathematics:
Exploring Theories and Practices (3)
EDU
6317 Teaching and Learning Sciences
(3)
EDU
6318 Teaching Social Studies for
Elementary Education (3)
EDU
6319 Master of Education Internship,
Phase I (3)
EDU
6320 Master of Education Internship,
Phase II (3)
RED
6310 Teaching Reading as Thinking (3)
Most topics
selected to address the Action Research
Project requirement include pedagogical
knowledge. This is significant because
program candidates have the opportunity to
synthesize their pedagogical knowledge
related to their own classroom setting. See
samples of Action Research Project in
Exhibit 1.3.4.
Completion of Graduation Requirements
The Action
Research Project (Table
1.1.13)
the Teaching Digital Portfolio (Table
1.1.14)
and other products of learning
demonstrate higher level of pedagogical
content knowledge. The first sequence of
courses, applicable to most advanced
licensure programs in education, provides
the opportunity for candidates to relate
such knowledge to elementary school
pedagogy. Learning, curriculum, technology,
and learning assessment are the central
themes of the core courses:
EDU
6301 Curriculum Development and
Cultural Diversity (3)
EDU
6302 Media, Technology, and Diversity
(3)
EDU
6303 Psychology of Teaching and
Learning (3)
EDU
6304 Research Methodology (3)
EDU
6305 Statistics: Introduction to
Quantitative Methods (3)
Courses in
elementary education have as specific focus
the pedagogy of elementary school teaching,
such as instructional design, instructional
methodology, teaching and learning,
integration of technology, and assessment.
EDU
6315 Integrating the Elementary
Program and Curriculum (3)
EDU
6316 Fundamentals of Mathematics:
Exploring Theories and Practices (3)
EDU
6317 Teaching and Learning Sciences
(3)
EDU
6318 Teaching Social Studies for
Elementary Education (3)
EDU
6319 Masters of Education Internship,
Phase I (3)
EDU
6320 Masters of Education Internship,
Phase II (3)
RED
6310 Teaching Reading as Thinking (3)
The Digital
Teaching Portfolio is perhaps the product of
learning that integrates more effectively
the elementary school curriculum, the
state’s Advanced Technology Competencies,
and the Advanced Master’s Competencies.
Data generated by program candidates amply
demonstrate command of pedagogical content
knowledge.
Application of M.
Ed. Knowledge, Skills, and Dispositions, and
Follow-up Studies
Follow-up
studies of M.Ed. graduates and their
employers indicate high level of pedagogical
competence. The M.Ed. Program faculty
regularly interview school principals to
gather their feedback about program
graduates. Such feedback has been
consistently favorable and supportive of the
faculty members’ efforts. In several
instances, graduates of this program have
become leaders in their own elementary
school setting, thus providing further
evidence of the strong pedagogical
foundation developed as a result of their
program.
During an
interview in 2005, one principal responded
as follows to the question, “Have you
noticed any growth in these areas her three
years in the M.Ed.?”: “Yes, more in
professional development and her leadership
role in the building. . . . She is an
excellent, excellent teacher.”
The
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County School System
elected one of the program’s graduates
Teacher of the Year. The local daily
newspaper featured another graduate for her
leadership role in the design and
implementation of an after-school tutorial.
The WSSU graduate school newsletter
featured a third graduate and the impact of
her action research project on her
students. Finally, the North Carolina
Department of Public Instruction videotaped
the results of the action research project
of one of the graduates. For further
information about pedagogical knowledge
during this transition point, consult the
following documents and exhibits:
·
School
principal interviews
·
Graduate
surveys
·
IHE Reports
·
News stories
Element
1.4: Professional and Pedagogical Knowledge
and Skills for Teacher Candidates
Initial
licensure candidates develop and demonstrate
professional and pedagogical knowledge and
skills incrementally. Introductory
professional education courses lay the
foundations for a higher level of knowledge
and skills, which culminate with methods
courses at program completion. The
continuum of professional and pedagogical
knowledge also provides candidates with a
number of sequentially planned field
experiences that culminate with a minimum of
twelve consecutive weeks of student
teaching. Evidence along the professional
and pedagogical continuum supports the
development of program candidates from
novice to first-year professionals. In the
M.Ed. advanced licensure program,
candidates’ initial license levels in
professional and pedagogical knowledge and
skills increase throughout the program to
levels of leadership within the elementary
school settings where program completers
work.
Assessment
data indicate a high rate of success at the
completion points for both initial and
advanced licensure programs. As indicated
above, ratings of student teachers and M.Ed.
program completers are above average
throughout both programs
Professional and Pedagogical Knowledge and
Skills for Initial Teacher Candidates
Program
candidates’ professional and pedagogical
knowledge and skills at the initial
licensure level are assessed at various
transition points in the program.
Development of professional and pedagogical
knowledge and skills is accomplished through
course work and field experience products of
learning. Assessment measures consistently
indicate high performance of program
graduates.
Entry
and Mid-Point (Admission to Teacher
Education and Admission to
Student Teaching)
Program
candidates move from beginning to the exit
clinical point of professional and
pedagogical knowledge and skills as the two
sets of courses describe below. Initial
knowledge and skills begin with foundational
courses intended to introduce novice
candidates to the teaching field. At this
level, knowledge and skills are limited to
general areas of the teaching profession.
The first set of courses (foundational) are
as follows:
|
EDU 2104 |
Introduction to Education (All
programs)
|
|
EDU 2304 |
Sociological, Historical and
Philosophical Foundations of
Education (All programs) |
|
SPE 3200 |
Exceptional Children in the Regular
Classroom (All programs)
|
|
|
|
As candidates
progress in their teacher education program
knowledge and skills increase in complexity.
Products of learning in the upper tier of
professional courses demonstrate increasing
familiarity with knowledge and skills
expected from program candidates. Not only
are candidates expected to develop knowledge
and skills specific to their chosen teaching
field, but they must also develop a set of
dispositions that distinguish them as
beginning professionals. Evidence
associated with this level of knowledge and
skill is developed through products of
learning from the following upper-level
courses as listed in the set below:
|
RED 4311 |
Reading Diagnosis and Correction (ELE
majors)
|
|
RED 4362 |
Methods and Materials of Reading
Instruction for Middle Grades (MGE
majors) |
|
RED 4364 |
Reading in the Content Area for
Secondary Education |
|
EDU 4338 |
Psychological Foundations of
Education (All programs) |
|
EDU 4333 |
Responsive Pedagogy (prefix may
change according to program) |
|
EDU ……. |
Methods courses for every program |
Data points
indicate above-average levels of competence
in professional and pedagogical knowledge
and skills of initial licensure candidates.
Exit of
Clinical (Completion of Student Teaching)
and Completion of Graduation Requirements
Summative evaluations from Exit Evaluation
of Student Teaching ratings show evidence of
candidates’ professional and pedagogical
knowledge and skills at the completion of
student teaching. Methods and capstone
courses
(https://wssu.tk20.com)
include
specific measures of candidates’
professional and pedagogical knowledge and
skills. Candidates generate multiple
pedagogical applications in their methods
courses and during student teaching.
Capstone and methods courses represent a
summative evaluation of professional and
pedagogical knowledge and skills as
evidenced on
Table 1.3.2
and
Table 1.3.3.
Summary scores from these two courses
indicate a high rate of success among
program candidates. Data analysis of
Student Teaching Exit Evaluation Criteria
from 2001-2004 (Table
1.3.4) and 2005-2006 (Table
1.3.7), respectively,
include assessment of professional and
pedagogical knowledge and skills. For
further information on learning products of
this transition point, please review program
professional portfolios and learning
products (Exhibit
1.3.5—Responsive Pedagogy
Portfolio).
Induction (and Follow-Up Studies)
The 2005
New Teacher Survey sections D and H (Table
1.4.1) specifically address
professional and dispositional development.
Program graduates were asked to address
specific behaviors associated with program
opportunities to further their professional
growth and development of dispositions. The
following includes a representative sample
of their responses.
Table 1.4.1
2005 New Teacher Survey (sections D & H)
|
Item |
Statement |
Percentage |
|
How useful was each of these
activities to your professional
growth as a teacher? |
|
D.2 |
Instructional strategies and methods
such as questioning strategies,
cooperative learning,
team
teaching, etc. |
87.5 |
|
D.5 |
Student assessment, e.g. methods of
testing evaluation, use of test data
in designing instruction.
|
89.3 |
|
D. 6 |
Classroom management and discipline
strategies. |
85.7 |
|
D.10 |
Establishing and maintaining working
relationships with parents and
families. |
88.8 |
|
D.15 |
Visits to other classrooms.
|
92.0 |
|
What proficiencies of the WSSU’s
Conceptual Framework are applicable? |
|
H.1 |
I
have a desire for lifelong learning.
|
83.9 |
|
H.7 |
I
have a sense of confidence that I
can make a difference in the lives
of my students. |
80.6 |
|
H.12 |
I
have a positive attitude towards
others. |
80.0 |
|
H.13 |
I
perceive and understand that
diversity is a positive asset.
|
80.6 |
|
H.15 |
I
have a feeling of respect and
empathy for others. |
87.1 |
|
H.18 |
I
believe that students with diversity
ability levels can learn.
|
87.1 |
|
H.19 |
I
believe in high expectations for all
students. |
83.9 |
Professional and Pedagogical Knowledge and
Skills for Advanced Teacher Candidates
In the M. Ed.
advanced licensure program, candidates
demonstrate professional and pedagogical
knowledge and skills through current
certification (A license), course learning
projects, and field experience products.
Course syllabi (Exhibit
1.3.6) show that professional and
pedagogical knowledge and skills are
addressed in the core and specialty area
courses. Candidates perform well in
professional and pedagogical skills, and in
some instances, they have had an
exceptionally positive influence on the
school culture, student learning, and
school-community relations. Candidates’
commitment to culturally responsive teaching
and educational equity are distinctive
outcomes of their professional and
pedagogical knowledge and skills.
Entry
Point (Admission to Graduate Studies)
Since program
candidates are required to begin their M.Ed.
advanced licensure program with initial
certification already completed (North
Carolina initial teaching license), courses
and field experiences in the M.Ed. program
further enhance their knowledge and
professional and pedagogical skills in
elementary education. Program faculty
members review the application packets of
program candidates to determine academic and
professional experience readiness for
advanced licensure studies. Review of
program applicants reveals appropriate
credentials in the teaching field and a
significant number of experiences in
elementary school settings. In addition to
the 3.0 above average GPA for the last three
academic years (Table
1.1.11),
successful program
completers had an average of seven years of
classroom experience before they entered the
M. Ed. program. This has had a
significant impact on the level of
instructional discourse of professional and
pedagogical knowledge and skills discussions
in class and the level of application in the
elementary classroom setting.
Mid-Point (Retention in the M.Ed. Program)
Throughout
their course work, program candidates are
routinely assessed to determine their
continuation in the program. No more than
two letter grades of “C” are permitted in
the program. While most courses in the M.Ed.
program contribute to the professional and
pedagogical knowledge and skills, courses
listed below advance program candidates’
focus on student learning, commitment to
diversity, critical thinking, and reflective
practice.
EDU
6315 Integrating the Elementary
Program and Curriculum (3)
EDU
6316 Fundamentals of Mathematics:
Exploring Theories and Practices (3)
EDU
6317 Teaching and Learning Sciences
(3)
EDU
6318 Teaching Social Studies for
Elementary Education (3)
RED
6310 Teaching Reading as Thinking (3)
Completion of Graduation Requirements
Candidates’
professional and pedagogical knowledge and
skills are assessed through a number of
culminating products, such as the Action
Research Project and the Digital Teaching
Professional Portfolio. Results of these
assessments for the 2004-2006 are presented
on
Table 1.1.13 and
Table 1.1.14. Candidates
are required to select an action research
project related to their teaching. This
further develops their pedagogical skills in
addressing specific areas of interest or
concern within their school or classroom
settings. Candidates are also expected to
integrate technology in their learning
products, specifically the digital portfolio
and the action research projects. The
success rate in the completion of these
products is high.
Application of M.
Ed. Knowledge, Skills, and Dispositions, and
Follow-up Studies
School
principals who employ advanced licensure
program completers consistently rate their
professional and pedagogical knowledge
skills favorably. An analysis of interviews
with principals reveals strengths in
instructional effectiveness, culturally
responsive teaching, and effectively
promoting literacy in elementary school
students. School principals strongly agree
(100%) that advanced licensure program
completers are effective in promoting
student learning.
M.Ed.
graduates’ follow-up surveys also
demonstrate program completers’ quality
preparation in professional and pedagogical
knowledge and skills. Candidates and their
employers (Table
1.1.17)
consistently rated high the ability to apply
research principles, assume leadership
roles, and facilitate learning for diverse
learners. Program completers’ leadership
examples have been acknowledged by local
media and members of the education
profession (Document
1.1.B).
Element
1.5: Professional Knowledge and Skills for
Other School Personnel
WSSU does not
have programs for other school personnel at
this time.
Element
1.6: Dispositions for All Candidates
Dispositions for Initial Teacher Candidates
Winston-Salem
State University’s motto “Enter to Learn,
Depart to Serve” embodies the dispositional
growth expected of all students who
matriculate at the university, especially
candidates in teacher education programs.
As described in the unit’s conceptual
framework, the sixteen (16) dispositions
adopted by the unit’s teacher education
faculty cluster under the following areas:
(a) professionalism, (b) commitment to
lifelong learning, (c) reflective and
critical thinkers, and (d) commitment to
diversity. Table
1.6.1 lists the unit’s
dispositions and their alignment with INTASC
Standards, theorists, and the unit’s
conceptual framework components. The
sixteen dispositions listed are the result
of numerous discussions at the Department of
Education and Teacher Education Council
levels. The number of dispositions has
fluctuated between sixteen and twenty-one
because of several pilot studies. Document
1.6.A includes the former
list of dispositions, which has been
replicated in at least three studies.
Entry
and Mid-Point (Admission to Teacher
Education and Admission to
Student Teaching)
In nurturing
strong dispositions in program candidates,
faculty members support the growth of
teachers who represent the best in the
teaching profession. Research has confirmed
that emerging teacher candidate attitudes
can be molded and changed through
discussion, reflection, and practice. It is
essential that candidates in teacher
education programs possess the necessary
dispositions to interact effectively with
students, families, communities, and
colleagues.
Transition
points describe the dispositional
development of teacher education candidate.
Prior to the Entry point, candidates receive
a list of the sixteen (16) dispositions at
the TEAP (Teacher Education Admission and
Partnership) Center, which provides academic
guidance to all pre-teacher education
candidates. It is at this time that
candidates are asked to acknowledge receipt
and understanding of the depositional growth
expected of every teacher education
candidate. At the Entry level, candidates
participate in a formative evaluation of
dispositions in Introduction to Education
(EDU 2104), which was changed to a special
section of Freshman Seminar (EDU 1301)
beginning in fall 2006. During this course
candidates are introduced to the INTASC
standards and dispositions 11 through 16. It
is at this point that candidates reflect on
their dispositional strengths and
weaknesses. Candidates then formulate a plan
for personal transformation. They collect
their reflections throughout their program
that later on, during the capstone course,
will afford them the opportunity to compare
their attitudinal growth at the completion
of the student teaching semester.
At the
Admission to Teacher Education point,
candidates must pass, in addition to other
academic requirements, an interview and a
written essay, and submit three letters of
recommendation addressing character and
dispositions. It is at this point that
program candidates are introduced to
additional professional dispositions in
order to develop a greater level of
awareness. An Early Intervention Committee
looks at candidates with potentially
problematic dispositions. In a few
instances, a corrective course of action
with a specific timetable has been
recommended to some students.
Table 1.6.2 describes disposition check points.
Table 1.6.2
Disposition Check Points
|
Course Number/
Check point |
Formative Assessment of Dispositions |
Summative
Assessment of Dispositions |
Person
Responsible |
Dispositions
Assessed |
Unit
Actions |
|
TEAP
Center |
Acknowledge of dispositional growth
expectations |
n/a |
TEAP-Center
Staff |
1-16 |
Communicate expectations of
dispositional growth |
|
EDU
2104- Intro. To Education |
Student Assessment on Dispositions |
Portfolio
|
Instructor,
Program Coordinator |
11-16 |
Counseling with Instructor |
|
Admission to Teacher Education |
|
Interview
Essay |
Teacher Education Committee,
Public
School Personnel,
Director of Teacher Education,
Program Coordinators |
10-16 |
Blockage from entry into Teacher
Education
Counseling with Director of Teacher
Education
Program Coordinators
|
|
ELE/BKE/MGE/SPE
4333
Responsive Pedagogy |
Pre-
Reflective Self-Assessment
Three
Individual Conferences on
Dispositions |
E
Portfolio
Post-Reflective
Self
Assessment
Dispositional Vignettes |
Instructor
Clinical Faculty |
1-10,
|
Counseling/Remedial Action
Program Coordinators
Director of Teacher Education |
|
EDU
4981
Student Teaching |
Pre-
Reflective Self-Assessment
University Supervisor
Supervising Teacher |
Post-Reflective Self-Assessment |
Director of Teacher Education,
University Supervisor,
Supervising Teacher |
1-16 |
Counseling/Remedial Action
Non-Recommendation for Licensure |
|
Initial Teaching job Placement |
Mentoring Partnerships
Program Coordinators |
On-line follow-up Survey from
Program
|
Program Coordinators,
Principals,
Director of Teacher Education |
1-16 |
Remedial Action
Individual Growth Plan
Implementation |
Data
collection and analysis have been completed
on candidates’ disposition at several points
during the last three academic years. For
example
Table 1.6.3 includes a
data summary on disposition of 73 teacher
education candidates. Respondents included
freshmen, sophomores, juniors, seniors, and
licensure-only candidates. Their ages range
included 18 through 30+ years of age.
Twenty were already in a teaching setting,
50 in non-teaching settings, and three did
not respond to this item. Respondents
showed a favorable alignment with the
upper-end of the dispositions’ continuum
(Agree and Strongly Agree).
Exit of
Clinical (Completion of Student Teaching)
and Completion of Graduation Requirements
During the
capstone course (EDU 4333: Responsive
Pedagogy for BKE, ELE, MGE, MUS, and ART),
which is taken concurrently with student
teaching, professional summative conferences
with candidates act as major checkpoints to
assess candidates’ dispositional strengths
and weaknesses. Candidates reflect on their
dispositions and cite specific evidence in
the form of anecdotes or work samples as
documentary evidence. Table
1.6.4 includes a spring
2005 summary of candidates’ reflections on
dispositional growth.
Although the
above set of dispositions have been piloted
since 2003-2004 AY and, consequently, data
collection on dispositions and utilization
of results for program improvement are still
under development, the Exit Evaluation
Criteria of Student Teaching that was used
until 2005 assessed dispositional growth in
a systematic way. While the language of the
dispositions embedded in this Exit
Evaluation Criteria is not exactly the same
as the language of the present sixteen (16)
dispositions, behaviors are explicitly and
implicitly aligned. For a detailed analysis
of the past and present behavioral
disposition statements, refer to
Table 1.6.5
for
alignment of former and present disposition
statements
and to
Table 1.6.6
for the quantitative analysis.
Induction (and Follow-Up Studies)
The 2005
New Teacher Survey Sections B, D (Table
1.6.7), and especially section H
address dispositional development of program
candidates. Program graduates were asked to
respond to prompts related to their teacher
education preparation in developing
knowledge, skills, and dispositions. The
list below of statements and percentages
clearly indicates a favorable outcome
regarding the development of dispositions.
Table 1.6.7
2005 New Teacher Survey (Sections B, D, and H)
|
Item |
Statement |
Percentage |
|
As
result of my teacher preparation
program, I am able to: |
|
B.21 |
Reflect on my teaching.
|
86.6 |
|
How
useful was each of these activities
to your professional growth as a
teacher? |
|
D.10 |
Establishing and maintaining working
relationships with parents and
families. |
88.8 |
|
What proficiencies of the WSSU’s
Conceptual Framework are applicable? |
|
H.1 |
I
have a desire for lifelong learning.
|
83.9 |
|
H.7 |
I
have a sense of confidence that I
can make a difference in the lives
of my students. |
80.6 |
|
H.12 |
I
have a positive attitude towards
others. |
80.0 |
|
H.13 |
I
perceive and understand that
diversity is a positive asset.
|
80.6 |
|
H.15 |
I
have a feeling of respect and
empathy for others. |
87.1 |
|
H.18 |
| |